The Law Society seek permission to intervene in SFO and Eurasian dispute

November 27, 2017

The Law Society will seek permission to intervene in a landmark dispute between the Serious Fraud Office and mining company the Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation which could reset the parameters of legal professional privilege.


The case, which is due to be heard by the Court of Appeal, is considered to be a crucial test in that it could result in internal documents relating to criminal investigations being handed over to prosecutors.

A high court ruling handed down in May, went in favour of the SFO. The watchdog, which has alleged bribery and corruption against ENRC, claimed that documents prepared for ENRC’s own internal investigation should not be covered by privilege.


ENRC, which strenuously denies the bribery and corruption allegations, said the High Court’s decision seemed to penalise it for responsibly taking steps to investigate the allegations so that it could properly understand what had happened and what should be done.


Joe Egan, president of The Law Society, said: ‘Without the protection of legal professional privilege, firms may find it difficult to conduct effective internal investigations. If the ruling is upheld, it potentially has the perverse effect of discouraging firms from self-reporting for fear of the consequences.

‘The right for anyone to communicate confidentially with their lawyer is a fundamental part of our legal system and we want to ensure that this right is protected for all of us, including corporations.’

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Featured Posts

Spring Law receiving recognition for outstanding legal services

June 5, 2018

Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
  • Spring Law LinkedIn Page
  • Spring Law Twitter Page

© Copyright Spring Law 2018 | Site created by IMC